Agri-Labs Holdings LLC v. TapLogic LLC
| Agri-Labs Holdings LLC |
| TapLogic LLC |
| TapLogic LLC |
| Agri-Labs Holdings LLC |
| 1:2015cv00026 |
| January 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| De Kalb |
| Susan L Collins |
| Robert L Miller |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
OPINION AND ORDER denying 155 Motion to Reconsider. The Court AFFIRMS its reasoning in its 1/16/18 Order and Opinion. The Court also AFFIRMS the trial date set for 9/17/18 at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time before Chief JudgeTheresa L. Springmann. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 4/3/18. (nal)
|
|
Filing
152
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 131 of non-infringement. The Court grants summary judgment of non-infringement on all claims except Independent Claim 1. The Court also grants summary judgment of no direct infringement of Claim 1 and no contributory infringement of Claim 1. The Court DENIES the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 129 of invalidity, DENIES the Defendant's request to dismiss this case for improper venue and lack of personal jurisdiction, and DENIES the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 142 of infringement. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/16/2018. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
137
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Agri-Labs' 133 Motion to Strike TapLogics Motion for Summary Judgment, Request Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(d) and Request for Court Ordered Mediation and DENIES Agri-Labs Motion to Strike Tap Logics Motion for Summary Judgment, Request Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(d) 135 . The Plaintiff must respond to the Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment within twenty-eight days of the date of this Order. In the interest of a clear and complete record, the Defendant may supplement its Motions for Summary Judgment by appending the Statement of Material Facts. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 9/18/2017. (jss)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Disqualify Counsel Dean McConnell and Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Claim Construction Discovery to Include September 16, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 10/29/2015. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 55 Non-Party Agri-Labs Inc.'s, Objection and Motion to Quash Subpoena filed by Agri-Labs, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 10/20/15. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION AND ORDER granting 33 Motion. TapLogic is ORDERED to serve Agri- Labs with amended preliminary non-infringement contentions in accordance with this Opinion and Order on or before 8/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 7/31/15. (mc)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 39 Second MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Agri-Labs Holdings LLC. The parties may submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with the requirements of Rule 26(c) and Seventh Circuit case law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 7/24/2015. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER denying 23 Motion for approval of the proposed agreed Protective Order: parties may submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with the requirements of Rule 26(c) and Seventh Circuit case law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 4/27/15. (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
