McKinney v. Sheriff of Whitley County Indiana The Office of the et al
Plaintiff: Terrance S McKinney
Defendant: Sheriff of Whitley County Indiana The Office of the and Tony Helfrich
Case Number: 1:2015cv00079
Filed: April 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Susan L Collins
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS 87 McKinney's motion to transfer venue. The Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly reassign this case to another Judge within the Northern District of Indiana. Case reassigned to Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen for all further proceedings. Judge William C Lee no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 11/9/2018. (lhc)
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 81 MOTION for Reconsideration re 77 Opinion and Order filed by Mark Hodges, Sheriff of Whitley County Indiana The Office of the. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 7/17/2018. (lns)
May 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 77 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART, as follows: McKinney may add Mark Hodges as a defendant and pursue his Section 1981 claims against both Hodges and Whitley County; McKinney may not pursue any Equal Protection claims against any party; and the amended complaint does not relate back to the filing of the original complaint. Further, Plaintiff's motion to amend his second motion to amend 62 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 5/21/2018. (lhc)
November 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Tony Helfrich, Sheriff of Whitley County Indiana The Office of the. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 11/14/16. (cer)
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER denying 16 Motion for entry of agreed protective order. The parties may submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with the requirements of Rule 26(c)(1), Seventh Circuit case law, and this Courts local rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 10/19/2015. (rmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKinney v. Sheriff of Whitley County Indiana The Office of the et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrance S McKinney
Represented By: Robert O Vegeler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff of Whitley County Indiana The Office of the
Represented By: Julie J Havenith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tony Helfrich
Represented By: Julie J Havenith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?