DirectBuy Inc v. Next Level Marketing Inc et al
Plaintiff: DirectBuy Inc
Defendant: Next Level Marketing Inc, Karuna Talwar, Gurmeet S Talwar and Parkash Talwar
Case Number: 2:2009cv00084
Filed: March 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Contract: Franchise Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 53 MOTION to Vacate filed by Parkash Talwar. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 5/5/11. (kjp)
December 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER: DENYING 43 Motion for Reconsideration or in the alternative to Allow Prior Answer to Stand and GRANTING 31 Motion for Default Judgment as to defendant Parkash Talwar ONLY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 12/14/2010. (rmn)
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, the defendants, Next Level Marketing, Karuna Talwar, and Sukpreet Talwar, are ORDERED SEVERED from the remaining parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/22/10. (kjp)
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER granting 29 Motion to Quash Service of Process as to Defendant Gurmeet Talwar; denying 30 Motion for Leave to File Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Amend Complaint to be filed by Parkash Talwar and granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Strike Parkash Talwar's Motion for Leave to Answer and Gurmeet Talwar's Motion to Quash. The Court STRIKES the Affidavit of Service 18 and Parkash Talwar's Motion for Leave to Answer 30 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 10/28/2010. (rmn) Modified on 10/28/2010 TO ADD WORD OPINION (mc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DirectBuy Inc v. Next Level Marketing Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DirectBuy Inc
Represented By: C Joseph Yast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Next Level Marketing Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karuna Talwar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gurmeet S Talwar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Parkash Talwar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?