Gatlin Plumbing & Heating Inc et al v. Welty Building Company Ltd et al
Plaintiff: Gatlin Plumbing & Heating Inc and United States
Defendant: Welty Building Company Ltd, Roth Bros Inc, Carnegie Management and Development Corporation and Ohio Farmer's Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2012cv00114
Filed: March 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER The Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART the Motion to Dismiss or to Stay Pending Mediation and/or Arbitration DE 14 . Specifically, the Court DENIES the Defendants request that the Court dismiss this cause as against them for la ck of subject matter jurisdiction. However, the Court GRANTS the Defendants request that the Court stay this matter pending mediation and/or arbitration. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for 3/28/2013 01:30 PM in US District Court - Hammond before Judge Theresa L Springmann. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/26/13. (kjp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gatlin Plumbing & Heating Inc et al v. Welty Building Company Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gatlin Plumbing & Heating Inc
Represented By: Colby A Barkes
Represented By: Steven A Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Represented By: Steven A Johnson
Represented By: Colby A Barkes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Welty Building Company Ltd
Represented By: Elizabeth Lucas Barnes
Represented By: R Lawrence Steele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roth Bros Inc
Represented By: LaTasha R Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carnegie Management and Development Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Farmer's Insurance Company
Represented By: Elizabeth Lucas Barnes
Represented By: R Lawrence Steele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?