Yoon v. VanCleef

Appellant: Stacia L Yoon
Appellee: Terry L VanCleef
Case Number: 2:2013cv00031
Filed: January 17, 2013
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 24, 2013 21 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL re 1 . the Appellants motion to strike [DE 17] is DENIED. The Court REVERSES the bankruptcy courts order, and REMANDS this case for further proceedings relative to VanCleefs objection to the claims. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/24/2013. (rmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yoon v. VanCleef
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Stacia L Yoon
Represented By: Stacia L Yoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Terry L VanCleef
Represented By: Daniel W Matern, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.