Holmes v. United States Steel Corporation
| Sharod Holmes |
| United States Steel Corporation |
| 2:2023cv00359 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 11/30/2023, before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Pla appeared by atty David Masse. Dft appeared by atty Megan Van Pelt. The Report filed as DE #13 is ADOPTED as follows: Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 1/11/2024. Fact discovery to be completed by 7/23/2024. Plaintiff expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the defendant by 9/19/2024. Defendant expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the plaintiff by 11/19/2024. Expert witness depositions to be completed by 1/23/2025. Rule 26(e) supplements due by 12/19/2024. All expert witness discovery to be completed by 2/6/2025. The last date to seek leave of court to join additional parties and to amend the pleadings for Pltf is 1/11/2024; for Dft is 1/18/2024. Parties anticipate the case should be ready for a 3 day jury trial by December 2025. Parties reminded of disclosure obligations under General Order 2023-6. Court stresses importance of considering all ethical implications of using AI, including checking any cited authority. Magistrate Consent forms due by 12/21/2023. All other dates/ddls to be set by presiding judge at a later time. (Tape #ZOOM 2.) (tc)
|
|
Filing 13
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (McDermott, Dorothy)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Finding good cause shown and noting the parties' agreement, the Court GRANTS #11 Motion for Extension of Time. United States Steel Corporation to respond to the complaint by 12/22/2023. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 11/27/2023. Text entry order. (tc)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and/or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, Agreed by Defendant United States Steel Corporation. (McDermott, Dorothy)
|
|
Filing 10
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/30/2023 10:00 AM Central time before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 833-568-8864, enter Meeting ID 161 2255 6691 and passcode 252788 to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 11/17/2023. (tc)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 10/24/2023. (tc)
|
|
Reset Answer Deadline pursuant to #6 . Answer due from Defendant United States Steel Corporation by 11/22/2023. (shk)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (shk)
|
|
Filing 6
AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by United States Steel Corporation ; answer due by November 22, 2023. (McDermott, Dorothy)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by United States Steel Corporation Proof of Service and Notice of Filing Notice of Removal in State Court (McDermott, Dorothy)
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by United States Steel Corporation. (McDermott, Dorothy)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Megan A Van Pelt on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (Van Pelt, Megan)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Dorothy D McDermott on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (McDermott, Dorothy)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5387852.) from Lake Superior Court, Cause No. 45D11-2309-PL-000658, filed by United States Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File (Docket, Complaint, Appearance, and Summons), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDermott, Dorothy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holmes v. United States Steel Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sharod Holmes | |
| Represented By: | David W Masse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Steel Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Megan A Van Pelt |
| Represented By: | Dorothy D McDermott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
