First Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Supreme Corporation
Plaintiff: First Specialty Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Supreme Corporation
Case Number: 3:2012cv00186
Filed: April 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 118 OPINION AND ORDER - The Court DENIES First Specialty's Motion to Reconsider 99 , and in doing so reaffirms the answer to the first core question in this case: whether First Specialty had a duty to defend Supreme in the King County litigation. T he answer to that question is yes. As to the amount of Supreme's recoverable defense costs, Supreme may recover $818,320.61 in principal from First Specialty. Supreme is further entitled to prejudgment interest as a matter of law, at a rate of eight percent per annum calculated from 6/14/2013. Regarding the question of whether First Specialty has a duty to indemnify Supreme, the answer is also yes. As a result, the Court GRANTS Supreme's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on thes e questions 98 and DENIES First Specialty's Motions for the same. 102 and 104 Lastly, the Court DENIES First Specialty's Motion to Strike 110 . Left open for the factfinder is the question of how much indemnity Supreme may recover from First Specialty. The Court will contact the parties to set a scheduling conference to explore the next steps in this case. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/28/2018. (saj)
June 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 93 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 91 Second MOTION to Stay Pursuant to Rule 56(d) by Plaintiff First Specialty Insurance Corporation. The Court DEFERS ruling on the parties; cross motions for partial summary judgment 55 & 59 and First Specialty's Rule 56 Motion to Strike 83 to permit First Specialty time for discovery and supplemental briefing related to the number of occurrence issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/14/2017. (lhc)
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER denying 17 First Specialty's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 19 Supremes cross Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 26 First Specialty's preliminary motion to amend the complaint ; granting 31 First Specialty's motion to amend the complaint. On its own motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), the court consolidates 3:14 CV 1613 with the present case, for all purposes . Because of that consolidation, First Specialtys mot ion to dismiss 3:14 CV 1613 (DE #10) is DENIED as moot. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (a), and Local Rule 72-1(b), the court hereby ORDERS that this case be assigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein for purposes of holding a scheduling/settlement conference at his and the parties earliest convenience. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/30/15. (mc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: First Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Supreme Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Specialty Insurance Corporation
Represented By: James R Branit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supreme Corporation
Represented By: Michael J Hays
Represented By: James M Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?