Brocuglio v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
| Linda Brocuglio and Wayne Brocuglio |
| Thor Motor Coach Inc |
| 3:2014cv02097 |
| December 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James T Moody |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 24 MOTION to Exclude Tom Bailey Valuation Testimony by Defendant Thor Motor Coach Inc; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadin gs as to UDTPA Claim by Defendant Thor Motor Coach Inc; DENYING 31 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 28 Affidavit in Support of Motion, Motion to Strike Exhibits 5, 9, 10 and 11 Attached to Declaration of John D. Sear by Plaintiffs Linda Brocuglio, Wayne Brocuglio. Judgment on the pleading is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Linda Brocuglio and Wayne Brocuglio's UDTPA claim. That claim (Count III) is DISMISSED. Defendant Thor Motor Coach Inc's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED. Plaintiffs GRANTED until 5/1/2017 to file a brief motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint. If no such motion is filed by that date, this matter will proceed to the Court's trial calendar. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 3/31/17. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
