Maldonado v. Commissioner of Social Security
Crystal Maldonado |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
3:2018cv00068 |
January 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Elkhart |
Philip P Simon |
Michael G Gotsch |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 32 First MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) filed by Crystal Maldonado. Attorney Matthew F. Richter of Keller & Keller is awarded net attorney's fees in the amount of $15,85 1.50 (or 25% of plaintiff Maldonados past-due benefits) for his representation of Crystal D. Maldonado before the court in this matter, payable directly to attorney Keller from the amount withheld by the Commissioner of Social Security from Maldonado's past-due benefits. Attorney Keller shall refund to Maldonado the EAJA fee award of $3,113.50 previously approved by the court. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/22/2021. (lhc) |
Filing 27 OPINION AND ORDER: The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff Crystal Maldonado's application for Social Security Disability benefits is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. The Clerk shall ENTER judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 8/29/19. (ksp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.