Cotton v. Hill et al
Plaintiff: Gemari Cotton
Defendant: Kenneth P Cotter, Curtis Hill and Micheal Dvorak
Case Number: 3:2019cv00714
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2019 Filing 7 Initial Filing fee: $14.68, receipt number 3023462 (rmc)
September 17, 2019 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE as to #4 Opinion and Order and #5 Clerks Judgment. (nal)
September 10, 2019 Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party - Certified #7099 3400 0003 4516 1022). (nal)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/10/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party - Certified #7099 3400 0003 4516 1022). (nal)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING Plaintiff to immediately pay $14.68 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/10/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed in Order)(bas)
August 30, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Gemari Cotton. (motion not signed)(rmc)
August 30, 2019 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 3 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms and with Jury Demand against Kenneth P Cotter, Micheal Dvorak, Curtis Hill, filed by Gemari Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(sent copy back w/case #)(rmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cotton v. Hill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth P Cotter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Micheal Dvorak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gemari Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?