HOLLEMAN v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Defendant: ARAMARK CORPORATION, JANE DOE, LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING, D. LEATHERS, TERESSA LITTLEJOHN, JERRY LYTLE, SERGEANT PETTY and JOHN SCHILLING
Case Number: 1:2011cv00323
Filed: March 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER - The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 118 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Mr. Holleman's claims against Grievance Specialists Littlejohn and Lytle. Ms. Little john and Mr. Lytle are therefore dismissed from this action. The Motion is also GRANTED as to any claim of deliberate indifference that took place before March 3, 2009. Because there are genuine issues of material fact regarding whether Defendants Sergeant Petty, Lieutenant King, and Mr. Schilling were deliberately indifferent to Mr. Holleman's serious need for adequate nutrition, the Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to the claims against Sergeant Petty, Lieutenant King, and Mr. Schilling for alleged incidents that occurred after March 3, 2009. No partial final judgment shall issue as to the claims resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/28/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ENTRY denying 59 Motion to Dismiss. *SEE ENTRY*. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/27/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ENTRY - Mr. Holleman's motions to compel production of documents from the DOC (Dkt. 129 ) is DENIED and his motion to compel (Dkt. 126 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with the foregoing. To the extent that his motions are granted, the defendants shall have fifteen days from the issuance of this Entry in which to comply with the rulings contained herein. ***SEE ENTRY***. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/25/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ENTRY - Defendants Littlejohn and Schilling shall have a further period of time, through May 17, 2013, in which to respond to the motions to compel (dkt 97 and dkt 99 ) with the required specificity. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/3/2013. Copy Mailed.(JD)
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ENTRY - Mr. Holleman's motions for entry upon land [Dkt. 80 ], [Dkt. 81 ], and his motion to compel [Dkt. 92 ] are each DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/5/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOLLEMAN v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. LEATHERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERESSA LITTLEJOHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JERRY LYTLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SERGEANT PETTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN SCHILLING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?