Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SCHILLING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16544
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHILLING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARTSOCK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARTSOCK
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT CARTER, JR., JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. ARAMARK et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
BENNIE K. REED
Defendant:
ARAMARK, B. SMITH, D. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JESTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00461
Defendant:
LISA BOCK, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. BEDWELL et al
as 1:2019cv03036
Defendant:
LISA BOCK, DANIEL BEDWELL, RANDY VANFLEET and others
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2019cv00321
Defendant:
STEPHEN HUNT, DANIEL BEDWELL, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JASPER L. FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv02180
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DAVID MASON and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv02164
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DAVID MASON and others
Plaintiff:
BRIEN CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner Bey v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Akeem Turner Bey
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Indiana Department of Correction, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Aramark American Food Services, LLC
as 2:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jason Jones
Defendant:
Aramark American Food Services, LLC , John Schilling , Mike Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
