UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MARCUM et al
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| MARCUM COMPANIES LLC, JOHN K MARCUM and GUARANTY RESERVES TRUST LLC |
| 1:2013cv01361 |
| August 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER granting the Security and Exchange Commission's 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants are preliminarily enjoined from violating the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The 12 Asset Freeze Order entered on August 26, 2013 shall remain in full force and effect and all assets subject to that order remain frozen pending further Court order. Defendants continue to be enjoined from destroying documents as set forth in paragraph V of 11 the Or der for Temporary Restraining Order and Other Ancillary Relief. Defendants shall make an accounting to the Court within seven (7) days as directed herein. This preliminary injunction shall remain in effect until a Final Judgment is issued or this action is otherwise finally disposed of. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/9/2013. (PGS) Modified on 9/9/2013 (PGS).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
