Franklin v. Simmons et al
| Elibah Franklin |
| Con-Way Freight, Inc. and Kenneth Lee Simmons |
| Thomas Scott Davis |
| Con-Way Freight, Inc. and Kenneth Lee Simmons |
| 1:2013cv00093 |
| September 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Cedar Rapids Office |
| Cedar |
| Edward J McManus |
| Jon S Scoles |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Set Aside 47 Order. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 9/3/2014. (pac)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 39 Motion to Remand to State Court. Davis v. Simmons et al.,Case No 13-CV-92-LRR and Franklin v. Simmons et al., Case No. 13-CV-93-LRR are remanded to the Iowa District Court for Cedar County. The Clerk of Court is directed to take a ppropriate steps to effectuate such remand. The court retains jurisdiction of this case solely with regard to the court's award of costs and expenses to Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Consistent with the court's findings a bove, Plaintiff Elibah Franklin is ordered to pay Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Con-Way Freight, Inc. and Kenneth Lee Simmons's costs and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The Clerk of Court is directed to satisfy all pending motions in both cases as moot and to close these cases. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 7/24/14. (ksy)(Copy w/NEF to Cedar County District Court)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
