Gardner v. Cardinal Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Gardner
Defendant: Cardinal Construction, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2013cv02001
Filed: January 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Eastern Waterloo Office
County: Black Hawk
Presiding Judge: Edward J McManus
Presiding Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 7/18/2013. (Stigler, Karo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gardner v. Cardinal Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Gardner
Represented By: John R Walker, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cardinal Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Frank Harty
Represented By: Stacey L Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?