Sloan v. Meko et al
William D. Slone |
Reed, Ford, Joseph P. Meko, Jack Conway, David W. Barr and Commonwealth of Kentucky |
0:2012cv00095 |
November 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Ashland Office |
Elliott |
PSO |
Henry R. Wilhoit |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 17 by William D. Slone is DENIED AS MOOT; (2) Slone's MOTION 20 to Amend/Correct is OVERRULED AND DENIED. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr. on 4/19/2013.(CMR) cc: COR, William D. Slone by U.S. Mail |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 6 is DENIED AS MOOT; (2) MOTIONS 8 AND 13 requesting a hearing are DENIED AS MOOT; (3) MOTION 12 seeking a default judgment is DENIED AS MOOT; (3) Slone's con stitutional claims asserted in original Complaint DE 1 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) Slone's constitutional claims asserted in his First and Second Amended Complaints, DE 5 and 10 , are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (5) This matter is STRICKEN from the active docket; (6) The Court will enter a separate Judgment. (Case Terminated.) Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr. on 3/12/2013.(CMR)cc: COR, William D. Slone aka William D. Sloan by U.S. Mail |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.