DE GAETANO v. LAPINSKI et al
| RICHARD DE GAETANO |
| JOHN J LAPINSKI and LINDA S LAPINSKI |
| BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK, CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK and DIGGA DOWN EAST LLC |
| 1:2008cv00294 |
| September 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Negotiable Instrument Office |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER adopting 102 Report and Recommended Decision for 95 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by RICHARD DE GAETANO, denying 95 Motion for Attorney Fees. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER affirming 91 Report and Recommended Decision for 84 Emergency Motion for Contempt and Other Relief filed by RICHARD DE GAETANO; granting 84 Emergency Motion for Contempt and Other Relief. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
81
FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER REGARDING TURNOVER OF TRUSTEE ASSETS granting 80 Motion for turnover order. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 37 Report and Recommended Decision for 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by RICHARD DE GAETANO. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by RICHARD DE GAETANO. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2009. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
