FITZPATRICK v. TELEFLEX INC et al
| GORDON FITZPATRICK |
| TELEFLEX INC and TELEFLEX CANADA INC |
| 1:2008cv00400 |
| November 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Contract: Other Office |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DETERMINATIVE QUESTIONS OF LAW TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT denying 78 Motion for Order. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 54 Motion to Exclude; denying 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 14 Report and Recommended Decision for 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by TELEFLEX CANADA INC, TELEFLEX INC. Plaintiff's Counts Three, Five and Seven are dismissed. Counts One, Two, Four and Six remain. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by TELEFLEX CANADA INC, TELEFLEX INC. Objections to R&R due by 3/6/2009. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
