O'LEARY v. INFRASOURCE TRANSMISSION SERVICES COMPANY
Plaintiff: RANDY D O'LEARY
Defendant: INFRASOURCE TRANSMISSION SERVICES COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2009cv00175
Filed: May 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER denying 32 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'LEARY v. INFRASOURCE TRANSMISSION SERVICES COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RANDY D O'LEARY
Represented By: JULIE D. FARR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INFRASOURCE TRANSMISSION SERVICES COMPANY
Represented By: JONATHAN SHAPIRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?