WILLINGHAN v. STONINGTON, TOWN OF
Plaintiff: HOWARD S WILLINGHAN
Defendant: STONINGTON, TOWN OF
Case Number: 1:2009cv00540
Filed: October 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 26 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
September 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Federal Claims. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLINGHAN v. STONINGTON, TOWN OF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HOWARD S WILLINGHAN
Represented By: DAVID G. WEBBERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STONINGTON, TOWN OF
Represented By: MARK E. DUNLAP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?