SNOW v. U S POSTAL SERVICE
| ELIZABETH SNOW |
| U S POSTAL SERVICE |
| 1:2010cv00174 |
| May 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Piscataquis |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing as moot 11 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 6 Objection to Notice of Removal. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SNOW v. U S POSTAL SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ELIZABETH SNOW | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U S POSTAL SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | EVAN J. ROTH |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
