ADAMS et al v. MAINE MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION
| MARY ADAMS, JOHN H WIBBY, JR, PEMBROKE SCHAEFFER and CYR PLANTATION |
| MAINE MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION |
| 1:2010cv00258 |
| June 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Kennebec |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER granting in part 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing Counts 1, 2 and 3 of the Amended Complaint insofar as those Counts assert claims under the Free Speech Clause of the United States Constitution; dismissing without prejudice in part as to Count 4 By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgw)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 62 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Supplemental Statements of Fact, granting the Defendants motion to be allowed to further respond to the Plaintiffs July 13, 2012 filings with its own responses both to the supplemental factual filings and to the legal memorandum. Said responses will be due 14 days from the date of this Order or October 2, 2012. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgw)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER dismissing without prejudice 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
