RUFFIN v. FITZPATRICK et al
| DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN |
| JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JODY BRETON, RUSSELL WORCESTER, JR, STEVE WIGCLZIKSKI, MARK SILVENKSKI, WILLIAM MARTIN and BENJAMIN BEAL |
| 1:2014cv00453 |
| November 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Knox |
| JOHN C. NIVISON |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER AFFIRMINJG THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 39 Report and Recommendations, granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment, and entering judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's remaining claims. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
39
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WILLIAM MARTIN, BENJAMIN BEAL, MARK SILVENKSKI, STEVE WIGCLZIKSKI, JODY BRETON, RUSSELL WORCESTER, JR. Objections to R&R due by 6/13/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 Report and Recommendations, granting 15 Motion to Amend, and granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the AMENDED COMPLAINT. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
