DREWRY v. STATE OF MAINE
Petitioner: BRANDON B DREWRY
Respondent: STATE OF MAINE
Case Number: 1:2014mc00187
Filed: September 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Bangor Office
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Motion for Enlargement of Time to File a Habeas Petition filed by BRANDON B. DREWRY and 3 Motion for Copies, Typewriter, Laptop, iPad and Printer filed by BRANDON B. DREWRY; denying 1 Motion for Enlargement of Time to File a Habeas Petition; dismissing as moot 2 Motion for Copies, Typewriter, Laptop, iPad and Printer. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DREWRY v. STATE OF MAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF MAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BRANDON B DREWRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?