ERGO LICENSING LLC v. CARDINAL HEALTH INC et al
| ERGO LICENSING LLC |
| CAREFUSION 303 INC |
| CAREFUSION 303 INC |
| ERGO LICENSING LLC |
| 2:2008cv00259 |
| August 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Patent Office |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
204
ORDER ON CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION re 139 Motion on Claims Construction. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE- Scheduling Conference set for 8/3/2010 at 10:00 AM in Judge Singal's Chambers before JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. Counsel shall file a Joint Agenda for the Conference by NOON on 7/30/2010. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 117 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 167 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (nrg)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 65 Report and Recommendations; Granting 30 Motion to Dismiss; Denying 36 Motion to Change Venue. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY -granting 42 Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery ; granting 42 Motion to Stay deadline for responding to Motion to Dismiss. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (mnw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
