LIBBY v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ET AL

Defendant: GENERAL DYNAMICS ARMAMENT AND TECHNICAL PRODUCTS INC and GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
Plaintiff: DANIEL LIBBY
Case Number: 2:2013cv00114
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: Maine District Court
Office: Portland Office
County: York
Referring Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Presiding Judge: NANCY TORRESEN
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 American Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LIBBY v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ET AL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GENERAL DYNAMICS ARMAMENT AND TECHNICAL PRODUCTS INC
Represented By: MELINDA J. CATERINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
Represented By: MELINDA J. CATERINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANIEL LIBBY
Represented By: PETER L. THOMPSON
Represented By: CHAD T. HANSEN
Represented By: ALLISON G. GRAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.