WALKER v. LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC
| PAMELA WALKER |
| LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC |
| 2:2015cv00059 |
| February 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - granting 38 Motion for Approval of Settlement. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WALKER v. LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PAMELA WALKER | |
| Represented By: | JAMES A. CLIFFORD |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
