INMAN v. LANDRY
| FRANK INMAN |
| SCOTT LANDRY |
| 2:2015cv00113 |
| March 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| JOHN C. NIVISON |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 49 Report and Recommendations; No evidentiary hearing is warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases 44 Order to Show Cause; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 35 Report and Recommendations; denying 30 Motion for release ; denying 34 Motion for release. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 23 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; granting 25 Motion to Dismiss; denying in part and dismissing in part 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 Report and Recommendations and denying 6 Motion for Bail and denying 7 Second Motion for Bail. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: INMAN v. LANDRY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FRANK INMAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
