ATER v. BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| MELISSA ATER |
| PHIPPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1 & 2, COREY ATER, BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2 and OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 |
| 2:2019cv00568 |
| December 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JON D LEVY |
| JOHN H RICH |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by MELISSA ATER. Reply due by 2/18/2020. (PARADIE, VERNE) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to COREY ATER. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (bfa) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES Responses due by 2/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Bail Violation Memo, #2 Exhibit B - DA Acknowledgment of Bail Violation Memo)(KLINE, ROBERT) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, CROSSCLAIM against COREY ATER by BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT.(WALL, JOHN) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by KASIA S. PARK on behalf of OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, PHIPPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT (PARK, KASIA) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MELISSA ATER. PHIPPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT served on 1/14/2020. (PARADIE, VERNE) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MELISSA ATER. MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES served on 1/10/2020. (PARADIE, VERNE) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MELISSA ATER. BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT served on 1/13/2020. (PARADIE, VERNE) |
| Set Answer Deadline for MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES : Answer due by 1/31/2020. (akr) |
| Set Answer Deadline for BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT : Answer due by 2/3/2020. (akr) |
| Filing 4 Defendants Phippsburg Police Department and Officer John Doe 2's ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM against COREY ATER by OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, PHIPPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT.(BENJAMIN, EDWARD) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to COREY ATER, BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES, PHIPPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Bath Police Department summons, #2 Phippsburg Police Department summons, #3 Corey Ater summons)(bfa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COREY ATER, BATH POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES, OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1 & 2, PHIPPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT with Jury Demand PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by MELISSA ATER. (Service of Process Deadline 3/17/2020) Fee due by 12/20/2019.(bfa) |
| Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AMEDC-2129254.), filed by MELISSA ATER.(PARADIE, VERNE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
