GILBERT v. STATE OF MAINE
| DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT |
| STATE OF MAINE |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES |
| 2:2022cv00350 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Eighth AMENDMENT filed by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE re Withdrawal of Jury Trial Demand by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Change of Address by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDMENTS filed by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT re #8 Amended Complaint (Main Document: Sixth Amendment). (Attachments: #1 Seventh Amendment, #2 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDMENTS filed by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT re #8 Amended Complaint (Attachments: Main Document: Second Amendment #1 Third Amendment, #2 Fourth Amendment, #3 Fifth Amendment, #4 Envelope 1, #5 Envelope 2, #6 Envelope 3)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 8
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against STATE OF MAINE, filed by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE re #1 Complaint filed by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT. Although the Clerks Office has no obligation to review pleadings for personal identifiers, please note that the above-referenced document contains personal identifiers in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1. Please also refer to the Information Handout for Pro Se Filers. This will be the only Notice of Violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1 you will receive in this case. The filing party may remedy this violation by filing a redacted version of the document adding REDACTED to the top of the filing along with, a Motion to Seal the previously filed unredacted document. If no action is taken, the unredacted document will remain publicly available. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE: Recently DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT filed a pleading in this Court without representation of an attorney. Information regarding representing yourself is available on the Court's website at #https://www.med.uscourts.gov/handout-self-represented-parties including a Handout for Self-Represented Parties. This handout is intended for informational and practical purposes only and in no way takes the place of an attorney's legal advice, but it may provide some answers to procedural and general questions. ALSO NOTE: You are responsible for notifying the Court in writing of any changes to your mailing address or telephone number and of any change in status regarding representation by an attorney. (cc: pro se litigant) (tcs)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT (tcs)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against STATE OF MAINE with Jury Demand, filed by DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT. (Service of Process Deadline 2/6/2023) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(tcs)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
