Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ali

Plaintiff: Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Nadeem Ali
Case Number: 1:2010cv02024
Filed: July 23, 2010
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Baltimore City
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 15, 2010 38 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/15/10. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2011 59 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 4/22/11. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
May 25, 2011 67 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/25/11. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Maurice Michael LaPlaca, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nadeem Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.