Estate of Robert S. Bowen v. United States of America

Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Estate of Robert S. Bowen
Case Number: 1:2011cv02231
Filed: August 11, 2011
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Anne Arundel
Presiding Judge: Marvin J. Garbis
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:6702
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 24, 2012 20 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 Motion of United States for Summary Judgment; denying 15 Motion of plaintiff for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 7/23/12. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estate of Robert S. Bowen v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of Robert S. Bowen
Represented By: William Rowan Bernetich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.