United States of America v. One 2007 Mercedes Benz CLS 550 VIN WDDDJ72X37A102758

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One 2007 Mercedes Benz CLS 550 VIN WDDDJ72X37A102758
Case Number: 1:2011cv03390
Filed: November 23, 2011
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Baltimore County
Presiding Judge: William D Quarles
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge William D. Quarles, Jr. on 3/27/2012. (bf2, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One 2007 Mercedes Benz CLS 550 VIN WDDDJ72X37A102758
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Peter M Nothstein
Represented By: Rod J Rosenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One 2007 Mercedes Benz CLS 550 VIN WDDDJ72X37A102758
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.