Walter v. Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC
Deann Walter |
Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC |
1:2012cv03091 |
October 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Frederick |
Marvin J Garbis |
Civil Rights: Accomodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 cv |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 2/20/14. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Deann Walter. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(King, Robert) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W King on behalf of Deann Walter (King, Robert) |
Filing 10 SETTLEMENT ORDER DISMISSING case with each party to bear its own costs unless otherwise agreed without prejudice to the right of a party to move for good cause to reopen this action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 1/23/13. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC. (Scully, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint And Defenses to Complaint by Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC.(Scully, Elizabeth) |
Deficiency Notice as to Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC. Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 1/7/2013 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. Responses due by 12/28/2012. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 11/29/12. (Garbis, Marvin) |
Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply To Complaint And Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC Responses due by 12/17/2012 (Scully, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deann Walter. Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC served on 10/24/2012, answer due 11/14/2012. (Penn, Brien) |
Filing 4 MARGINAL ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 11/14/12. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint And Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC Responses due by 12/3/2012 (Scully, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0416-3749833.), filed by DEANN WALTER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Summons)(Penn, Brien) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Walter v. Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deann Walter | |
Represented By: | Robert W King |
Represented By: | Brien M Penn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Riverview Plaza (E&A) LLC | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Anne Scully |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.