United States of America v. 386 Hines Drive, Swanton, Maryland, 21561 with all Buildings, Appurtenances, & Improvements Thereon

Defendant: 386 Hines Drive, Swanton, Maryland, 21561 with all Buildings, Appurtenances, & Improvements Thereon
Plaintiff: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2013cv01091
Filed: April 11, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Baltimore City
Presiding Judge: J. Frederick Motz
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. 386 Hines Drive, Swanton, Maryland, 21561 with all Buildings, Appurtenances, & Improvements Thereon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 386 Hines Drive, Swanton, Maryland, 21561 with all Buildings, Appurtenances, & Improvements Thereon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Rod J Rosenstein(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Harry Mason Gruber(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.