Chalk v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.

Counter_defendant: Lender Process Services, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Tracey L. Chalk
Case Number: 1:2013cv01593
Filed: May 31, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Anne Arundel
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 31, 2013 24 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/31/13. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chalk v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Lender Process Services, Inc.
Represented By: Paul Sweeney(Designation Retained)
Represented By: James R Schraf(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Tracey L. Chalk
Represented By: Phillip R Robinson(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Scott C Borison(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.