Rideout v. Futurecare Rehabilitation Services, Inc.
Michael Rideout |
Futurecare Rehabilitation Services, Inc. |
1:2014cv00994 |
March 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Baltimore County |
William M Nickerson |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Plaintiffs 35 (at 4) Request to Amend Complaint to Add Claims; Remanding case to Circuit Court for Baltimore County. Signed by Judge William M Nickerson on 12/4/2014. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/4/14) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rideout v. Futurecare Rehabilitation Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Futurecare Rehabilitation Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Charles R Bacharach |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Rideout | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.