Woodson v. State's Attorney for the State of Maryland
Petitioner: Sean D. Woodson
Respondent: State's Attorney for the State of Maryland
Case Number: 1:2014cv01189
Filed: April 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: James K. Bredar
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 6/4/14. (c/m af 6/4/14)(amf, Deputy Clerk)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 5/6/14. (c/m 5/7/14)(amf, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodson v. State's Attorney for the State of Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sean D. Woodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State's Attorney for the State of Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?