Searls v. Johns Hopkins Hospital
Plaintiff: Lauren O. Searls
Defendant: Johns Hopkins Hospital
Case Number: 1:2014cv02983
Filed: September 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Chief Judge Catherine C. Blake on 1/21/2016. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Searls v. Johns Hopkins Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren O. Searls
Represented By: Laura Ginsberg Abelson
Represented By: Joseph B Espo
Represented By: Michael Adam Schwartz
Represented By: H Larry Vozzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johns Hopkins Hospital
Represented By: John Michael Gilman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?