Anderson v. United States of America
Marion Shawn Anderson |
United States of America |
1:2014cv03880 |
December 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
88888 |
William M Nickerson |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MANDATE of USCA as to 6 Notice of Appeal filed by Marion Shawn Anderson (krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 JUDGMENT of USCA affirming the judgment of the district court as to 6 Notice of Appeal filed by Marion Shawn Anderson (kr, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 USCA Case Number 15-6363 for 6 Notice of Appeal filed by Marion Shawn Anderson. Case Manager - Karen Stump (kr, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 ORDER Denying #3 Motion for Reconsideration; Denying #4 Supplemental filed by Marion Shawn Anderson re #2 Order Dismissing #1 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis; Declining to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge William M Nickerson on 3/12/2015 (c/m on 3/12/15 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 Correspondence: Letter from US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. (kr, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 6 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices. (kr, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #2 Order by Marion Shawn Anderson. See Pleading #4 (kr, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing page 3 of Presentence Report by Marion Shawn Anderson re #4 Supplemental, (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Supplement to #3 MOTION for Reconsideration re #2 Order filed by Marion Shawn Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Eugene Pearson Jr., #2 Indictment, #3 Plea Agreement, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit K)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Reconsideration re #2 Order by Marion Shawn Anderson (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(ca2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 ORDER Dismissing #1 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis; Declining to issue a Certificate of Appealabilty as to filed by Marion Shawn Anderson. Signed by Judge William M Nickerson on 12/18/2014. ( c/m 12/18/14bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and Request for an Expedited Hearing, filed by Marion Shawn Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Indictment)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anderson v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Marion Shawn Anderson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.