Sare v. Electronic Data Systems
Mike Sare |
Electronic Data Systems |
8:2008cv01567 |
June 16, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Montgomery |
Roger W Titus |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 Clerk's Order denying Taxing Cost signed on 12/7/09 (c/m 12/9/09 rk) (rank, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 12/10/2009 corrected date(rank, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 37 BILL OF COSTS by Electronic Data Systems. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Tax Costs, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Brosky, Gilbert) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 10/9/2009. (kn, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 10/13/09) |
Filing 35 ORDER that #24 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; that judgment for costs be entered in favor of the Defendant and that the clerk of the court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 10/9/2009. (kn, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 10/13/09) |
Filing 34 Correspondence: Returned Pleading Letter sent to Mike Sare (Attachments: #1 Surreply (first page only))(kn, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 10/7/09) |
Filing 33 REPLY to Response to Motion re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Electronic Data Systems. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unreported cases)(Brosky, Gilbert) |
Filing 32 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Electronic Data Systems re #31 Notice of Appearance (Babinski, Laurie) |
Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance by Laurie Ann Babinski on behalf of Electronic Data Systems (Babinski, Laurie) |
Filing 30 ORDER VACATING #28 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment; the Clerk is directed to REOPEN this case; the Defendant is DIRECTED to file a Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on or before September 9, 2009. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 9/1/09. (ch, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting #24 Motion for Summary Judgment, entering judgment in favor of Defendnt for costs and directing the Clerk to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 8/31/09. (c/m 8/31/09 rk) (rank, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 29 RESPONSE in Opposition re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mike Sare. Replies due by 9/11/2009. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Tab A, #3 Tab B, #4 Tab C)(kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 27 Correspondence to Plaintiff Mike Sare from U.S. District Judge Roger W. Titus regarding #24 Motion for Summary Judgment. (kn, Deputy Clerk)(c/m to Plaintiff 8/13/09 cc) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying #23 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 12/16/2008. (kn, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 12/16/08 kn) |
Filing 25 NOTICE by Electronic Data Systems re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Appendix in Support of) (Attachments: #1 Tab A, #2 Tab B, #3 Tab C, #4 Tab D, #5 Tab E, #6 Tab F, #7 Tab G, #8 Tab H)(Brosky, Gilbert) |
Filing 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Electronic Data Systems Responses due by 1/1/2009 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Brosky, Gilbert) |
Filing 23 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mike Sare. Responses due by 12/4/2008. (kn, Deputy Clerk)(c/s 11/18/08 kn) |
Filing 22 STATUS REPORT by Electronic Data Systems. (Brosky, Gilbert) |
Filing 21 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #19 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for attorney Gilbert P Brosky on behalf of Electronic Data Systems. Directing attorney Gilbert P Brosky to register on-line for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/attorney/registration.asp.. Signed by Clerk on 8/25/08. (cmns, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 20 NOTICE by Electronic Data Systems of Withdrawal of Appearance of Kelly M. King, Esq. (Harvey, Brian) |
Filing 19 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Gilbert P. Brosky on behalf of Electronic Data Systems Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 04160000000001822606. by Electronic Data Systems (Harvey, Brian) |
Filing 18 NOTICE by Electronic Data Systems of Initial Report Regarding Consent to Proceeding Before A United States Magistrate Judge (King, Kelly) |
Filing 17 Notice acknowledging filing of case, and involvement with parties by Mike Sare (ch, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 11/13/2008.. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 7/1/08. (ch, Deputy Clerk)(c/m pltf 7/2/08) Modified on 7/2/2008 (ch, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 15 NOTICE by Electronic Data Systems of Compliance with Standing Order Concerning Removal (Harvey, Brian) |
Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for attorney Kelly M King on behalf of Electronic Data Systems. Directing attorney Kelly M King to register on-line for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/attorney/registration.asp.. Signed by Clerk on 6/26/08. (cmns, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13 NOTICE by Electronic Data Systems Corporate Disclosure Statement (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EDS Entities)(Harvey, Brian) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kelly M. King on behalf of Electronic Data Systems Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 04160000000001766719. by Electronic Data Systems (Harvey, Brian) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Electronic Data Systems.(Harvey, Brian) |
Filing 10 Correspondence: Removal Notification Letter (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER Re: Notice of Removal. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on June 18, 2008. (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 Deficiency Notice -- Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 6/27/2008 (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing of Notice of Removal by Electronic Data Systems (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 FILED IN ERROR - Declaration of Suzy Arnold filed by Electronic Data Systems. (kn, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 6/18/2008 (kn, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Electronic Data Systems. (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER - Track II (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of New Case Number (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Electronic Data Systems filed by Mike Sare. (Attachments: #1 Civil-Non-Domestic Case Information Report)(kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, case number 295457-V. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 84637012718), filed by Electronic Data Systems. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kn, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/18/2008: #2 Declaration of Suzy Arnold) (kn, Deputy Clerk). |
The above pleadings (2-7) are all copies of original papers filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sare v. Electronic Data Systems | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Electronic Data Systems | |
Represented By: | Laurie Ann Babinski |
Represented By: | Kelly Marie King |
Represented By: | Brian S Harvey |
Represented By: | Gilbert P Brosky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mike Sare | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.