Awah v. Commonwealth Financial Systems

Plaintiff: Edmund Awah
Defendant: Commonwealth Financial Systems
Case Number: 8:2013cv00707
Filed: March 7, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Deborah K. Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 9, 2013 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 17 Plaintiff's motion to compel, GRANTING 19 Defendant's motion to seal, and SEALING Exhibit 1 attached to Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 18-1) (c/m to Plaintiff 12/9/13 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 12/9/13. (sat, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Awah v. Commonwealth Financial Systems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edmund Awah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth Financial Systems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.