Bhari Information Technology System Private Limited v. Sriram

Plaintiff: Bhari Information Technology System Private Limited
Defendant: Komal Sriram
Case Number: 8:2013cv01480
Filed: May 21, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Prince George's
Presiding Judge: Paul W. Grimm
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 29, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/28/2013. (rss, Deputy Clerk)
December 2, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court AMEDNED MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/02/2013. (bas, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bhari Information Technology System Private Limited v. Sriram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bhari Information Technology System Private Limited
Represented By: Nathan H Seltzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Komal Sriram
Represented By: Vernon W Johnson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.