Cox v. US Postal Service FCU
Loretta Elaina Cox |
US Postal Service FCU |
8:2014cv03702 |
November 26, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Greenbelt Office |
Prince George's |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 6/27/2016. (tb2, Chambers) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 6/17/2015. (c/m 6/17/2015 aos, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. US Postal Service FCU | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Loretta Elaina Cox | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: US Postal Service FCU | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.