Seikaly v. Seikaly
| Rudolph Mounib Seikaly, as Administrator of the Estate of Mounib Seikaly, Deceased, and as Personal Representative and Rudolph Mounib Seikaly |
| Richard Seikaly |
| 8:2019cv00167 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Charles B Day |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 3/12/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re: #13 Consent to Magistrate Judge. Please correct the following error(s):**Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures, consent forms are to be filed with the event 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge located in Other Filings >Other Documents >25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 13 [FILED IN ERROR - WRONG EVENT] Consent to Magistrate Judge (Shaffer, Mark) Modified on 3/11/2019 (kns, Deputy Clerk). |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 3/1/2019. (Day, Charles)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day. Richard Seikaly or counsel for Richard Seikaly are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2018-04, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 3/13/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time for Answer or Responsive Pleading by Richard Seikaly (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Shaffer, Mark) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rudolph Mounib Seikaly. Richard Seikaly served on 2/3/2019, answer due 2/25/2019.(Lopez, Laina) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER CANCELLING Show Cause Hearing re: #6 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 2/6/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Rudolph Mounib Seikaly to show cause for failure to comply with #Standing Order 2018-04. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/29/2019 02:00 PM in (proceed to the Clerk's Office to determine the location of the hearing) before the Chambers Judge. This Order shall be vacated if Rudolph Mounib Seikaly files a consent or declination prior to the show cause hearing date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 2/6/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint, filed by Rudolph Mounib Seikaly was filed incorrectly. **Not all attorneys listed as counsel are admitted to the Maryland Federal Bar. Court staff has entered the appearance of only the attorneys who are admitted. All other attorneys must seek formal admission or admission pro hac vice. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Richard Seikaly. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 1/22/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day. Rudolph Mounib Seikaly or counsel for Rudolph Mounib Seikaly are directed to the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2018-04, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 2/5/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richard Seikaly ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7793065.), filed by Rudolph Mounib Seikaly, as Administrator of the Estate of Mounib Seikaly, Deceased, and as Personal Representative. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Summons)(Lopez, Laina) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
