Hammond v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Case Number: 0:2006cv01670
Filed: May 4, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER re 135 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Debra Hammond, Rittal Corporation (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 30, 2010. (HAM)
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 31, 2010. (HAM)
November 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER re 123 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Ortal Diecasting, Ltd., Patrick John Hammond, Debra Hammond, Rittal Corporation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing all claims by Plaintiff Debra Hammond against Defendants Rittal Corporation and Ortal Diecasting, Ltd., with prejudice, and without costs or disbursements to any party.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 19, 2009. (HAM)
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER re 122 Letter to District Judge filed by Patrick John Hammond, Debra Hammond. Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. The depositions and any related discovery must be completed by February 1, 2010.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 16, 2009. (HAM)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) granting in part and denying in part defendants Rittal Corporation's and Ortal Diecasting's 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion is granted as to plaintiffs' failure-to-warn claims< /i>. Motion is denied in all other respects. (2) granting defendant Compaq Computer Corporation's 87 Motion for Summary Judgment. Compaq is dismissed with prejudice from this case. (3) The Court grants the parti es 60 days to conduct additional discovery, including taking deposition testimony and responding to requests for document production, regarding the substance of the plaintiff-submitted affidavits of Brian Killeaney, David Thomas, and Gary Ehlinger (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 29, 2009. (DML)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hammond v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?