Voss v. Johnson & Johnson
Case Number: 0:2006cv03728
Filed: September 15, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 128 PRETRIAL ORDER #10 re selection of next bellwether case(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 8, 2011. Associated Cases: 0:08-md-01943-JRT, 0:06-cv-03728-JRT-AJB, 0:07-cv-01862-JRT-AJB, 0:07-cv-03960-JRT-AJB, 0:08-cv-05745-JRT(DML)
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 125 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1)granting in part and denying in part defendants' (19) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in case 0:08-cv-05743-JRT. The motions are denied as to all Phase 1 Minnesota plaintiffs' claims under the Unfair Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.13 (Count 6), denied as to claims under the Consumer Fraud Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.69 (Count 8), denied as to claims under the False Adverti sing Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.67 (Count 9), denied as to claims under the Senior Citizen and Handicapped Consumer Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.71(Count 7), claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.44 (Count 6) are dismissed as withdrawn, granted as to claims for breach of implied warranty (Count 3) and the breach of implied warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice, denied as to claims for breach of express warranty (Count 4), and denied as to claims for unjust enrichment(Count 10); (2) granting in part and denying in part defendants' (19) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in case 0:08-cv-05745-JRT. The motions are denied as to all Phase 1 Minnesota plaintiffs' claims under the Unfair Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.13 (Count 6), denied as to claims under the Consumer Fraud Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.69 (Count 8), denied as to claims under the False Advertis ing Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.67 (Count 9), denied as to claims under the Senior Citizen and Handicapped Consumer Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.71(Count 7), claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.44 (Count 6) are dismissed as withdrawn,; granted as to claims for breach of implied warranty (Count 3) and the breach of implied warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice, denied as to claims for breach of express warranty (Count 4), and denied as to claims for unjust enrichment(Count 10); (3) granting in part and denying in part defendants' (116) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in case 0:06-cv-03728-JRT-AJB. The motions are denied as to all Phase 1 Minnesota plaintiffs' claims under the Unfair Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.13 (Count 6); granted as to claims under the Senior Citizen and Handicapped Consumer Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.71(Count 7) and this claim is d ismissed with prejudice, claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.44 (Count 6) are dismissed as withdrawn, granted as to claims for breach of implied warranty (Count 3) and the breach of implied warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice, denied as to claims for breach of express warranty (Count 4), and denied as to claims for unjust enrichment(Count 8); (4) granting in part and denying in part de fendants' (106) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in case 0:07-cv-01862-JRT-AJB. The motions are denied as to all Phase 1 Minnesota plaintiffs' claims under the Unfair Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.13 (Count 6); denied as to claims under the Senior Citizen and Handicapped Consumer Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.71(Count 7), claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.44 (Count 6) are dismissed as withdrawn, granted as to claims for bre ach of implied warranty (Count 3) and the breach of implied warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice, denied as to claims for breach of express warranty (Count 4), and denied as to claims for unjust enrichment(Count 10); (5) granting in part and denying in part defendants' (79) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in case 0:07-cv-03960-JRT-AJB. The motions are denied as to all Phase 1 Minnesota plaintiffs' claims unde r the Unfair Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.13 (Count 6), denied as to claims under the Consumer Fraud Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.69 (Count 7), denied as to claims under the False Advertising Act, Minn. Stat. 325F.67 (Count 6), claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Minn. Stat. 325D.44 (Count 8) are dismissed as withdrawn, granted as to claims for breach of implied warranty (Count 3) and the breach of implied warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice, denied as to claims for breach of express warranty (Count 4), ; (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 8, 2010. Associated Cases: 0:08-md-01943-JRT et al.(DML)
January 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER regarding Certificates of Service. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 11, 2010. Associated Cases: 0:08-md-01943-JRT et al.(HAM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Voss v. Johnson & Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?