Garcia v. Anderson et al
| Jessie Garcia |
| Jane Doe, T. Tran, Marty C Anderson, John Doe and S. Stanton |
| 0:2008cv04731 |
| July 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Olmsted |
| Graham |
| Montgomery |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 44 Report and Recommendation; denying 52 Plaintiff's Objections; denying 50 Motion to Reconsider Order on Motion to Alter Judgment; granting 12 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment filed by John Doe, Jane Doe, T. Tran, S. Stanton, Marty C Anderson (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 02/04/2010. (TLU)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 33 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 44 Report and Recommendation.; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 9/2/2009. (GS)
|
|
Filing
44
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) be GRANTED; Garcias claims against Defendants Warden Marty C. Anderson, Dr. T. Tran, and Dr. S. Stanton be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Garcias claims against Defendants Jane Doe and John Doe be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and Garcias Motion in Opposition to Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 33) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham on 08/13/2009. (NES)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
