Quist v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

Quist v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Jeffery Quist
Defendant:	Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2008cv05261
Filed:	September 24, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Hennepin
Presiding Judge:	Boylan
Presiding Judge:	Frank
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 22, 2010	Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Sunbeam's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. To the extent Sunbeam seeks to preclude Plaintiffs from bringing a claim for property damages, S unbeam's motion is DENIED; b. To the extent Sunbeam seeks to preclude Plaintiffs' failure-to-warn claim because Plaintiffs lack expert testimony on the matter, Sunbeam's motion is DENIED; and c. To the extent Sunbeam seeks summary judg ment on Plaintiffs' claim for a post-sale duty to warn, Sunbeam's motion is GRANTED. 2. Sunbeams Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of James J. Novak (Doc. No. 23 ) is DENIED. 3. Sunbeams Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of William T. Cronenwett (Doc. No. 28 ) is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/22/2010. (BJS)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 22, 2010

Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Sunbeam's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. To the extent Sunbeam seeks to preclude Plaintiffs from bringing a claim for property damages, S unbeam's motion is DENIED; b. To the extent Sunbeam seeks to preclude Plaintiffs' failure-to-warn claim because Plaintiffs lack expert testimony on the matter, Sunbeam's motion is DENIED; and c. To the extent Sunbeam seeks summary judg ment on Plaintiffs' claim for a post-sale duty to warn, Sunbeam's motion is GRANTED. 2. Sunbeams Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of James J. Novak (Doc. No. 23 ) is DENIED. 3. Sunbeams Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of William T. Cronenwett (Doc. No. 28 ) is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/22/2010. (BJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quist v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffery Quist
Represented By:	Shawn M Raiter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?