Orsak v. Metropolitan Airports Commission et al
Stephan R. Orsak |
Metropolitan Airports Commission, Airport Police Department, Brad Wingate, David Karsnia and Darrell Graveley |
0:2008cv05274 |
September 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
Noel |
Tunheim |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on April 7, 2010. (HAM) |
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. 1) Defendants' motion as to plaintiff's excessive force claim against Officer Wingate is denied. 2) Defendants' motion as to all other claims is granted. All defendants other than Officer Wingate are dismissed from this case, and all claims other than plaintiff's excessive force claim are dismissed with prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 14, 2009. (DML) |
Filing 33 ORDER re 32 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Brad Wingate, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Stephan R. Orsak, Darrell Graveley, Airport Police Department. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims or any potential claims in this lawsuit against Sergeant Darrell Graveley are dismissed with prejudice and without costs or disbursements to any of the parties.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 25, 2009. (HAM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.